why do we continue to have automaTraffic Offence Automationted traffic offences even though the road toll continues to increase

While automated traffic enforcement, like speed cameras, is intended to improve road safety and reduce the road toll, the continued increase in fatalities suggests that these measures alone are not sufficient. Factors like increased traffic volume, driver behavior, and other contributing causes of accidents need to be addressed to effectively reduce road deaths.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

• Automated enforcement's role:
• Automated traffic enforcement, including speed cameras, red light cameras, and mobile speed cameras, aims to reduce accidents by deterring speeding and other traffic violations. These systems are effective at identifying and penalizing offenders, and they can operate continuously.

Limitations of cameras: However, speed cameras primarily target speed as a contributing factor to accidents. They don't address other critical issues like driver fatigue, distracted driving, impaired driving (alcohol or drugs), or the increased risk associated with older vehicles. Other factors: Other contributing factors include increased traffic volume due to population growth and urban sprawl, road design and maintenance, and the behavior of all road users, including pedestrians and cyclists.

The bigger picture: Addressing the road toll requires a multi-faceted approach that goes beyond automated enforcement. This includes:

• Targeted enforcement: Focusing on other risky behaviors like impaired driving and distracted driving.

Education: Educating drivers about safe driving practices and the consequences of risky behavior. Infrastructure improvements: Investing in road safety infrastructure and improving road design. Vehicle safety:

Encouraging the use of newer, safer vehicles and addressing the safety risks associated with older vehicles. Addressing specific demographics: Targeting specific groups with high rates of road accidents, like young drivers or motorcyclists.

Revenue vs. Safety

While some argue that automated enforcement is primarily a revenue-raising measure, governments say it's a safety tool. The revenue generated is often directed towards road safety initiatives, but the perception that it's primarily a revenue-generating tool can undermine public trust. Public Perception: The perception that speed cameras are not effective in reducing fatalities can lead to decreased trust in the government and law enforcement. This can lead to a situation where people are more likely to break the law, including driving unlicensed or uninsured.

The need for a comprehensive strategy:

In conclusion, while automated traffic enforcement plays a role in road safety, it's not a silver bullet. A comprehensive strategy that addresses multiple contributing factors, alongside effective enforcement, is needed to reduce the road toll.