A very well presented produced an articulated video.
But unfortunately comes to the wrong solutions. In my opinion.
Rays solutions are:
On the 1st point, that's already happening. Overall the whole world earns more than we spend.
Three very simple examples. More food is produced than is consumed, there is more shelter than there are people to take shelter and more energy is produced than is consumed.
These three examples items are physically. As opposed to what Ray implies in his first point, Money.
Money is a human created concept. It's not like food shelter or energy,but is used to barter food shelter and energy. Money is used to accurately wealth. Wealth, as Ray implies, can be created by earning more than is spent. But the importance thing is, what then happens with that wealth?
As Ray has accurately described, when the majority get so poor that they can not afford to buy food to eat, shelter from the elements or keep warm or cool; themselves, they will rise up against the minority about that injustice.
Earning more that we spend,by some and not others, would appear to exacerbate the problem rather than solve it.
The problem is not the size of the pie but how it's divided up
The problems of the world are not an inability to produce but an unwillingness to share.
To treat each other well. A very Noble proposition. However I think Ray needs to expand on it a lot more. A torturer who stops torturing someone for a few minutes, relatively, is treating that person well.
What happens when the person you're treating well does not treat you well?
May I suggest an alternative solution to Rays. A non-economic, non-market, non battering world wide society?